Abonnement premium: à partir de 3.95 euros par mois ! Clique ici pour t'abonner
Déjà 100000 membres et 1000 BDs & Mangas !

0 Abonnement

211 Abonnés

Voir tout

Statistiques

Commentaires: 21
Posts forum: 8
Level: 2, Prochain niveau dans 34 xp
Niveau: noob
Experience: 66
Points de traducteur: 0

Badges

Commentator:

Poster des commentaires sur le site

  • Bronze: 1er commentaire !
  • Argent: plus de 50 commentaires
  • Gold: plus de 500 commentaires !
Replier:

Répondre à un commentaire

  • Bronze: 1ere réponse à un commentaire
  • Argent: plus de 50 réponses
  • Gold: plus de 500 réponses
Messadjor:

Envoi de messages privés aux autres membres

  • Bronze: 1er message privé envoyé
  • Argent: plus de 50 messages privés envoyés
  • Gold: plus de 500 messages privés envoyés
Polemikor:

Créer un sujet sur le forum

  • Bronze: 1er sujet crée sur le forum
  • Argent: plus de 50 sujets crée
  • Gold: plus de 500 sujets crées !
Populor:

Nombre total d'amis

  • Bronze: deviens ami avec un membre
  • Argent: plus de 50 amis
  • Gold: plus de 500 amis
Postor:

Répondre à un sujet sur le forum

  • Bronze: 1ere réponse sur le forum
  • Argent: plus de 50 réponses !
  • Gold: plus de 500 messages sur le forum
Profiler:

Complete ton profil !

  • Bronze: Avatar uploadé
  • Argent: Completer tous les éléments du profil
  • Gold: Tous les champs du profil complétés et au minimum 3 autres médailles obtenues
Membre Premium:

Deviens membre premium

  • Bronze: sois membre premium minimum 1 semaine
  • Argent: Sois membre premium plus de 5 mois
  • Gold: Sois membre premium plus de 10mois

Blog de Leth.hate

P. 3
1 2 3 4 5
  • All
  • Post
  • Com.

Survival of the fittest. We've all heard that one. It is a quote attributed to Charles Darwin and liberally thrown around like cheese on pizza.
Survival of the strongest, only the strong survive, law of the jungle and all that shit.
The funny thing is, I've read Charles Darwin's Origin Of The Species and at no point did he write 'survival of the fittest' or any of it's variations. Nope, it's not there.
What he does mention, when not talking about worms or calling natives 'savages' as was the style of the time, is that the species that survive are those who are better adapted to the their environment. Those who are more fit to live in it.
That part of the book was twisted by industrialist (the corporate executives of the Victorian era) to show that they were the strongest therefore had evolutionary right to hire nine year old kids and pay them with a bowl of gruel for their 14 hours of work a day.

No. Evolution is about adaptability and Darwin saw this everywhere. Every organism is finely tuned to survive it's environment, because if it isn't, it wouldn't be here.

And here's the one that amuses me. We, as humans, assume we're the pinnacle evolution because we're so smart. The smartest animal on the planet in fact.
Ever since modern humans busted out of Africa, we steam rolled the Neanderthals because we are intelligent and they were just a bunch of hairy dumb shits, right?
Motherfucking wrong! Neanderthals had ten percent bigger brains compared to us. Their toolmaking techniques where complex and ingenious, far beyond anything modern humans could come up with. Neanderthals, it appears, were the superior species.

So what happened? Why are we here then? How did we wipe them out?
I'll tell you how... we out-fucked them.
No battle of wits or epic all out war of species. Nope, we simply reproduced faster than they did.

Luckily, Neanderthals did not completely disappear. Recently, genetics have shown that most of us (with some sort of Asian, European or American decent. Not pure African) have some traces of Neanderthal DNA (from roughly around 2% to 6%).

So next time the world appears to be getting dumber, it may not be your imagination. You don't need brains to take over. No, all you need to conquer the world is to fuck more than the guy next to you.

3févr.2013

And fuck we shall :)

Globalisation. It's kind of the new buzzword like 'information superhighway' was in the 90's and 'fetch me some penicillin because I'm pissing fire and razor blades.' in the 1940's.
But what does it mean? Is it a good thing, a bad thing? What the fucken?

What it means is that we are no longer living in an era of self contained nations. It is no longer possible to shut the door, tell everyone to fuck off and run your country as a hermit... North Korea has been trying to do this for decades and they are now in a state where a bowl of spaghetti would feed five families. They are not doing so well.

Globalisation has met a lot of opposition for various groups. It's uncomfortable, scary and it can bring a whole lot of unwanted baggage.
Think of it this way. Say you've been living with your parents. You only got a couple of people to deal with so you've manage to work out rules and protocols that allow you to live in sort of harmony. Suddenly, your entire family moves in. Cousins, uncles, long lost relatives. This will cause a lot of friction. Everyone has their own idea of how to run things and how to deal with each other. Suddenly your routine, protocols and bathroom is thrown in disarray. You're no longer as important as you thought you were.

In the 80's , it's first victim was communism. Capitalist saw this as confirmation that capitalism was the way forward and they went full steam ahead. Now capitalism is on life support and I don't think it will be waking up from its coma. Maybe we can draw a funny moustache with a marker before it kicks the bucket.
You see, the thing about communism and capitalism it that their demise was not due to them not working or being ineffective. Under the right conditions, both system have demonstrated that they can work. What happened was that they simply became obsolete. Both systems encourage despotism. Communism with despotism of state and capitalism with despotism of elite classes. Thanks to a wired, on-line and always connected world population, that shit don't fly anymore.

Now we're in a state of flux. There is a power struggle of different ideas and factions battling it out to become the next dominant philosophy that guides the world. Religious and fringe political groups are in upheaval for that same reason. I suspect they are wasting their time.

Just as Socialism was an answer to the exploited working class of the 18th century or environmental parties came out as an answer to the reckless environmental damage of the 20th century, I believe a new political/philosophical movement shall rise in this new world. A movement that defies national boundaries and not so much ignores cultural differences but acknowledges the common bonds that ties us all as a human family.
It won't be easy. We have an enormous amount of baggage to throw away. Nationalism, racial prejudices, socio-economic elitism. Heck, there are some countries out there that still haven't realised that they are but a small part of a very big planet and see themselves as more important that the rest of the world. I wish them luck because some of them are already paying the price for their self-importance.

No one can survive on their own anymore. For a few countries, these lessons will not be learned but beaten into by the circumstances.
It will not be pretty and a lot will be lost. Some individual cultures will cease to exist and the world as a whole will be a bit poorer for it. But really, it is what may need to happen for us to survive. In the end, that's the name of the game, survival.

27janv.2013

I'm not saying that capitalism isn't dead or dying, but democracy lives on. Communism could work only by threatening all the people to collaborate and sustaining a large army & police forces. Soviet Union did not fail in the cold war, communism did. Soviet communists were in many ways dependant on artificial market export/import with other countries of the Eastern bloc - and when they became falling apart, the whole system collapsed. For example - Soviets wouldn't be able to construct so many nuclear bombs had they not been supplied by cheap uranium from Czechoslovakia, where it was mined by political prisoners.
Capitalism slowly transformed into something else, communism simply collapsed, leaving the people mostly with nothing left. In other words - capitalism was a system economicaly strong enough to transform smoothly into something else, communism was never that strong. Also, Soviet Russia was a scientific superpower, in its own terms, but never a cultural superpower. Last great times of russian culture were in the early 1900's (silver age of russian culture).
And one more thing - Russia is a very specific country - as well as China. These countries could never really exist under a democratic rule, although they tried. Even today, globalisation impact is not as big there as expected.
People have many theories about almost everything, but they're still just people. They act the same for thousands of years - only the technology changes :) Communism, feudalism, capitalism, imperialism... something like that always existed and will always exist. I hope, that after we tried the extremes in the 20th century, we will ease up a bit :)

Of course democracy lives on, but democracy requires a wealth distribution system.
Capitalism was made strong through brutality an exploitation. North America and Western Europe were the face of capitalism but the truth was that the reason they lived so well was due to the exploitation and misery they were inflicting in places like Latin America. Brutal dictatorship states were imposed by Western powers to protect their own political interests and corporations.
But because of globalisation, the back end of capitalism is collapsing due to previously exploited nations building stronger democracies, policies and even economic models.

What we're seeing is a normalisation of extremes. Something new will come of it. I believe we will see a lot more mixtures of free market and socialism in the one pot.

I can agree with that statement :)



I had no idea! How did I not know this?!

Today I came across the terribly sad news that Sir Patrick Moore passed away on the 9th of December 2012.

This quirky showman of astronomy inspired many a child to take up astronomy with his infectious enthusiasm.
Although describing himself as an "amateur astronomer", his work in mapping the moon was used by the USA and the Soviet Union as reference for moon landings.

His monocled face and smashing British accent will be sadly missed and leaves a void that will be extremely hard to fill. His legacy however, will live on.

Good night, sir.

15janv.2013

Never heard about this guy, fucken ! Is it me or is the guy known only outside Europe ?

Well, I never heard about him too.

He is a British astronomer. Google BBC's The Sky At Night. I don't think he was well know with the general public outside the UK.

(This entry may not come out right since I'm currently nursing the worst hangover in the history of humanity.)

Right, just so you know, I'm a busy person. At most, I get one or two hours a day to work on my comic. It blows.
I wish I could update at least twice a week, but due to real life responsibilities and commitments the best I can do is once a week. However, single weekly updates brings forth a whole new bag of problems. In some ways they create more work for me.

1) You must wrap up a lot in that single page. Joke, story and punchline. You don't have the luxury of opening a joke then delivering the punchline on the next page. That would be in a week, and by then you'd forgotten the set up for the joke. So you must make a self contained page that not only moves the story forward at a brisk pace but also sets up a joke and delivers the punchline in a very limited amount of space.

2) Less frequent updates mean higher quality pages. That means spending a lot of time in the artwork and dialogue. Get everything just right. Make a rubbish page and you won't get a fresh chance to win new readers till next week. Try making the best page you possibly can.

3) Pacing. You don't get the luxury of establishing mood and setting with grand locale illustrations or long winded back stories. You gotta move the story along at neck breaking speed otherwise you could easily spend months in a single chapter. People would be bored very quickly.

4) People will forget you. Most people these days have the attention span of a fly on amphetamines. If you're not in their faces constantly, you'll fade from their memory very quickly.
Do stuff to remind them of you outside updates. Screen wallpapers, blogs, Facebook. Build a relationship with your readers and they may remember you not just your comic.

5) Discipline. Sometime, just because you're doing one page per week, you think you can get away without working on your comic for a couple of days. Sure, that brand new game you bought yourself is mighty tempting, but you do run the risk using up your comic making time and missing your update schedule date. You must have a clear timetable and targets, otherwise you'll fall behind.

6) Keep improving. I'm guilty of this one. Sometimes you're so busy and have so little time that you stagnate and stop experimenting. Try new things out and who knows, you might find a new technique that saves you time.

That's a lot of work. I can see why so many webcomics fold so quickly and yet, I'm amazed that so many stick to their guns and keep working on it, popular or not with or without readers. That, in a nutshell, is passion.

12janv.2013

Very talkative when you're hangover :).

I couldn't even write this in sober/normal state XD

i don't think i can write that much when i have an hangover...
By the way, why don't you try too do a week without news, and then you post 2 times in the next week, or 3times in 2 weeks (almost the same exept that you add another page between 2 that are planed) so you can make a joke on 2 pages i mean many manga do that, and as far as you don't do like hunter x hunter author, who take some 2 years long break <_< it will be fine ^^

Nouvelle sortie sur Leth Hate

En English, chapitre 11, page 9



12janv.2013
Me connecter

Pas encore de compte ?